Skip to main content

Wild Salmon and HOAs

"Diners Who Order 'Wild' Salmon Often Get Cheaper Substitute..." What does this CNBC story have to do with homeowner associations?

The story alleges deception. Winking and nodding. There's more of that all around, isn't there? In various businesses and organizations and even -- heaven forbid! -- in governments?

But this is more than just winking and nodding. It's about ignoring fundamentals. Let us repeat that...IGNORING FUNDAMENTALS!

Everyone -- homeowner and condo associations, included -- can be derailed basically by the same thing...ignoring fundamentals. That's what this is about.

For business firms, it's taking shortcuts that degrade quality and customer relations. What's more fundamental than quality? And ignoring fair, competitive pricing for products and services. What's more fundamental than fairness?

For HOAs and condo associations, it's ignoring governing documents. And getting sloppy with numbers -- a.k.a association finance. Prudently and thoughtfully managing the money homeowners pay into their association is a fundamentally important fundamental.

And with neighbor relations in mind, everyone communicating association information -- people serving on Boards and committees, and property managers -- needs to communicate thoughtfully and carefully.

With fundamentals in mind, the volunteers and professionals entrusted with leading associations might have the best shot at staying on track. And just as important...getting things right.


(At Least Some PR)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Always the same old HOA news

When there's news about HOAs on TV or in newspapers, it's mostly the same old news over and over again. Someone puts up a flag, changes something on their home, has hens, roosters or pigs on their property, maybe playground equipment. Things like that. If reporters happen to call, what happens? Lots of scrambling around, probably. An OMG! moment.  There's a reporter calling, emailing or knocking on the door! What are we going to do? What comes in handy, sometimes, is having some kind of general response in mind. So, when a reporter asks: What are you planning to do about this? (The THIS being one of those things like flags, roosters, etc.), the response might be: We hope to be able to address this situation through discussions involving the homeowner, our homeowners association and concerned neighbors. Something that says a little something, without saying more than should be said, especially when you're under pressure.

Houston!! We have an issue!

Two dinosaur sculptures in the front yard of a home located in an HOA in the Houston area just made ABC 13 Eyewitness News. The homeowner said "she's been contacted (by the HOA) and asked what her plans were" for the dinosaurs, a T-Rex and a Velociraptor. The homeowner's "plans are directly tied to their plans," according to the TV-news story. "She says she is prepared to contest any request that they be removed. It's about creativity, not conformity." Here's the thing about media coverage of just about anything...of organizations like HOAs, business firms and all the rest. It's the question of whether or not -- to what extent -- media coverage might influence situations and outcomes. When organizations -- and their policies -- are in the news, will media coverage influence policy decisions? Keeping in mind, of course, the key role of governing documents in policies and procedures.